NORRIS: AN ADMINISTRATION IN CRISIS
The Norris School District administration should understand something important: public criticism of its decisions did not begin with Trimm Photo. Long before our disagreement with Superintendent Dr. Derrick Joel and Dr. Mitchell Stine, residents, taxpayers, and parents were publicly questioning how the district was being managed.
Dr. Derrick Joel ($207,183) and Dr. Mitchell Stine ($116,479) yearly
A $34.8 MILLION BOND REJECTED BY VOTERS
In May 2026, voters rejected the district's proposed $34.8 million bond issue by a substantial margin.
That should have sent a clear message that the district needed to listen carefully to its taxpayers.
Instead, the district subsequently proposed increasing its property tax levy, generating additional controversy and bringing residents before the Board of Education to voice their objections.
RESIDENTS SPEAK OUT AGAINST THE ADMINISTRATION'S FINANCIAL DECISIONS
At the September 9, 2026, public hearing, Justin Drahota raised concerns about families struggling to afford rising property taxes. He described residents potentially having to make household cuts simply to remain in their homes.
Diane Mulder questioned the district's approach to increasing revenue rather than reducing expenses. Speaking about the proposed tax increase, she asked:
"Where do you think this money is going to come from?"
Another resident, Shellyn Sands, reminded the administration that taxpayers had already rejected bond proposals in both 2017 and 2026. Her position was straightforward: those elections should matter.
These were not anonymous Facebook commentators. These were identified community members publicly expressing concerns before their elected school board.
SOURCE: 10/11 NOW — Norris School District looks to increase tax levy after failed bond issue.
MORE TAXPAYERS QUESTION DISTRICT SPENDING
In late September 2026, 10/11 NOW reported additional criticism from residents.
David Schwaninger, a fourth-generation farmer near Hallam, questioned how schools are funded and called for alternative approaches to generating revenue.
Travis Buel, a Hickman landlord, explained how increasing property taxes affect both property owners and tenants. As he put it:
"Local property tax demands are simply rising faster than the family's paychecks."
The district has offered explanations for its financial decisions, including a reduction in state aid, rising operational costs, and aging facilities that need repairs.
Those concerns deserve consideration. So do the objections raised by the taxpayers expected to finance those decisions.
SOURCE: 10/11 NOW — Proposed Norris School District tax levy draws mixed reactions.
EARLIER QUESTIONS ABOUT ADMINISTRATIVE ACCOUNTABILITY
And this is not the first time questions about administrative accountability have become public.
In June 2023, following the arrest of a Norris teacher over allegations involving an inappropriate relationship with a student, parents questioned the district's earlier handling of information about the situation.
Norris parent Eric Pillard publicly called for an investigation and further action. Board member Gary Kubicek also expressed concern about the situation.
Other individuals defended the administration's response, including district employees who believed officials had acted appropriately based on the information available to them.
That controversy occurred under earlier district leadership, and it would be unfair to attribute those decisions to Dr. Joel simply because he is superintendent today.
Nevertheless, it illustrates that public disagreements over administrative decisions and accountability have occurred at Norris before.
AND NOW THERE IS TRIMM PHOTO
Now, in October 2026, Trimm Photo has its own serious concerns about how the current administration has handled our independent athletic coverage.
After more than ten years of covering high school athletics, we have publicly questioned the restrictions placed upon us and the administration's failure, in the correspondence we have received, to identify a specific written district policy supporting those restrictions.
Trimm Photo has generated more than 3.7 million views over the past 90 days. Those are total page views, not the number of individuals who have followed this particular dispute. Nevertheless, our publication gives these concerns a substantial public platform.
In my opinion, the Norris administration has given its own school a black eye through the way it has handled this controversy.
The students, athletes, teachers, and families of Norris deserve better than having their school associated with continuing disputes over transparency, communication, and administrative decisions.
The administration may disagree with our opinions. It may disagree with residents who question district spending. It may believe its decisions are entirely justified.
But disagreement does not eliminate the responsibility to provide clear explanations.
PUBLIC CONFIDENCE CANNOT BE DEMANDED. IT MUST BE EARNED.
And when members of the community repeatedly raise questions, the people responsible for running the district should be prepared to answer them.
Keith Trimm
Trimm Photo
ADDITIONAL PUBLIC RECORDS AND SOURCES
Norris Board of Education — September 9, 2026 Final Tax Request Hearing Minutes
THREE THINGS THE NORRIS ADMINISTRATION NEEDS TO UNDERSTAND.
I...
- HAVE NOT ACCEPTED the administration's decision to restrict my coverage of Norris athletics.
- HAVE NOT FORGOTTEN how I was treated or the questions that remain unanswered.
- HAVE NOT RULED OUT returning to Norris High School to cover athletic events.
And that brings me to Saturday, October 31, 2026.
Norris is scheduled to host a Class B district volleyball final at 10 a.m., provided the Titans advance from Thursday's semifinal.
On October 26, Norris Superintendent Dr. Derrick Joel wrote:
"Given our ongoing concerns, we will need to meet with you before you may attend future events or be on campus."
Yet despite my repeated written requests, Dr. Joel has:
- FAILED TO identify the specific written district policy authorizing the restrictions placed on Trimm Photo.
- FAILED TO identify the specific conduct or photographs that allegedly justified restricting my access.
- FAILED TO explain precisely what disruptions Trimm Photo caused that warranted these restrictions.
- FAILED TO clarify whether the same restrictions and mandatory meetings apply to other independent media organizations.
- FAILED TO explain why an in-person meeting is mandatory when these questions could be answered through written correspondence.
And then there is Dr. Mitchell Stine.
Throughout this controversy, Dr. Stine has:
- FAILED TO provide the written summary of his telephone conversation with Cheryl, despite promising to send it.
- FAILED TO explain why Cheryl understood that advance notification was sufficient, only to be told later that advance permission was required.
- FAILED TO answer Cheryl's direct question about whether other media organizations must obtain the same advance approval.
- FAILED TO identify the specific disruptions caused by Trimm Photo that justified directing us to cover other schools.
- FAILED TO clarify whether the original restriction was temporary or permanent and what conditions would allow my coverage to resume.
My position remains that these are reasonable questions deserving specific written answers.
I recognize the district's responsibility to maintain safety and order at school events. However, I also believe restrictions placed on independent media should be explained clearly and applied fairly.
Many people have reached out privately to express their support. Some have longstanding relationships with Norris, and I respect their decision not to become publicly involved.
Their encouragement has strengthened my determination to continue seeking a fair and proper resolution.
My concerns have never been about the student athletes. I enjoyed photographing them and recognizing their accomplishments.
My concerns are with the administrative decisions surrounding my coverage and the questions that remain unanswered.
I HAVE NOT ACCEPTED.
I HAVE NOT FORGOTTEN.
AND I HAVE NOT RULED OUT RETURNING.
AND Norris School needs to fix its leaky roof and broken air conditioners.
Keith Trimm
Trimm Photo
In my opinion, the Norris administration has given its own school a black eye. Through its handling of this controversy, it has brought unnecessary embarrassment and negative attention to a school that deserves better.
Trimm Photo has generated more than 3.7 million views over the past 90 days, and although those views are not all related to Norris, the administration should understand that its decisions are being questioned before a substantial public audience.
The students, athletes, teachers, and families of Norris did not deserve to be caught up in this controversy. They are not responsible for the decisions made by their administration. That responsibility belongs squarely with the people in charge.












